Free Lessons
Courses
Seminars
TechHelp
Fast Tips
Templates
Topic Index
Forum
ABCD
 
Home   Courses   Index   Templates   Seminars   TechHelp   Forums   Help   Contact   Join   Order   Logon  
 
Access v. SQL Server
By Richard Rost   Richard Rost on LinkedIn Email Richard Rost   15 years ago

Lots of people ask me, "what's better for my database: Access or SQL Server?" The short answer is this: if you have a small database, or a database being used by a small group of people, Access is perfectly fine by itself. As your needs grow, you can always upgrade to SQL Server and keep Access as a "front-end" database.

Access is a great database tool for single-user and small-group databases used over a LAN (corporate network). Access has the best design tools of any database program on the market (yes, even Access 2007, even though the design change irritated me). It's easy to create your tables, queries, forms, reports, macros, and even VBA code all within Access. I've been using Access since version 1.0 came out back in the early 90s, and I know it inside and out. I've had small and big business clients alike, and Access by itself is just fine for 90% of them.

Access is a stand-alone database program. If you need to share the database between multiple users, then you have to "share" the Access database file (either an MDB or ACCDB file, depending on which version of Access you're using). This is where the efficiency issue comes in. Access works just fine when sharing data between a small group of people (let's say 10 simultaneous users or less) but when you start talking about 15, 20, 30 people using the database at the same time, Access starts to slow down. A lot. Plus data stored in Access isn't REALLY secure.

This is where a database "server" comes in. The database server (usually running on a network file server, or its own dedicated box) does nothing but hand out data when requested. It holds all of the tables and can run all of the queries and just send you what information you need. If Access (alone) were to share a customer list on the network, for example, it would have to send your computer the WHOLE list of 10,000 customers and your local copy of Access would figure out the list of 20 customers it needs. By contrast, a database server would just run the query and send ONLY those 20 customers over the wire. Much faster. Much more efficient.

Now here's the thing... it doesn't matter WHAT database server you use on the back-end. You can use Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, or any number of other database servers. You can STILL USE ACCESS as your front-end and keep all of those forms, reports, macros, and VBA code you wrote when your database was small. You'll benefit from the added efficiency (and REAL security) of the new back-end database server, but you'll have the ease of use of the Access front-end.

So, again, I recommend building your database in Access. You can rapid-prototype and get your database up and running on a single, stand-alone PC. Then when you're ready to roll it out to a few users, share it on the network. Then, as your network grows and you're up to 10-15 users, go ahead and upgrade again with a back-end database server. It's all easy to do with Access.

Comments for Access v. SQL Server
 
Age Subject From
10 yearsNumber of usersRichard
11 yearsAccess DeploymentSelby H
15 yearsMSAccess sorting and grouping Richard Rost
15 yearsMSAccess sorting and grouping Richard J Muschamp
15 yearsAccess 2007Richard Rost
15 yearsAccess 2007Dianne McLaughlin
15 yearsAccess to SQLRichard Rost
15 yearsAccess to SQLGreg Beben
15 yearsUsing Oracle with MS Access front-endRichard Rost
15 yearsUsing Oracle with MS Access front-endFrank Parker
15 yearsAccess DeploymentRichard Rost
15 yearsAccess DeploymentChris Bezant
15 yearsSQL ServerRichard Rost
15 yearsSQL ServerChris Bezant

 

Start a NEW Conversation
 
Only students may post on this page. Click here for more information on how you can set up an account. If you are a student, please Log On first. Non-students may only post in the Visitor Forum.
 
Subscribe
Subscribe to Access v. SQL Server
Get notifications when this page is updated
 
 
 
 

The following is a paid advertisement
Computer Learning Zone is not responsible for any content shown or offers made by these ads.
 

Learn
 
Access - index
Excel - index
Word - index
Windows - index
PowerPoint - index
Photoshop - index
Visual Basic - index
ASP - index
Seminars
More...
Customers
 
Login
My Account
My Courses
Lost Password
Memberships
Student Databases
Change Email
Info
 
Latest News
New Releases
User Forums
Topic Glossary
Tips & Tricks
Search The Site
Code Vault
Collapse Menus
Help
 
Customer Support
Web Site Tour
FAQs
TechHelp
Consulting Services
About
 
Background
Testimonials
Jobs
Affiliate Program
Richard Rost
Free Lessons
Mailing List
PCResale.NET
Order
 
Video Tutorials
Handbooks
Memberships
Learning Connection
Idiot's Guide to Excel
Volume Discounts
Payment Info
Shipping
Terms of Sale
Contact
 
Contact Info
Support Policy
Mailing Address
Phone Number
Fax Number
Course Survey
Email Richard
[email protected]
Blog RSS Feed    YouTube Channel

LinkedIn
Copyright 2024 by Computer Learning Zone, Amicron, and Richard Rost. All Rights Reserved. Current Time: 6/17/2024 4:58:47 PM. PLT: 1s
Keywords: access v. sql server  PermaLink  Access v. SQL Server