The phrase "Perfect is the enemy of good," attributed to the French philosopher Voltaire, highlights a timeless challenge in many aspects of life: the pursuit of perfection can hinder progress. This concept warns us that striving for flawlessness often prevents us from achieving goals efficiently or even at all.
When I first started writing software, I fell into this trap. Every button on every form had to be meticulously aligned, the fonts and colors had to be just right, and every minor detail demanded perfection. This obsession led to projects taking three times longer than they should have. Looking back, the extra effort rarely added meaningful value to the functionality of the software.
A similar pattern emerged when I began creating video tutorials. In the early days, I would spend weeks crafting a single hour-long lesson. Every word was scripted in advance, and I meticulously re-recorded sections until I was satisfied they were flawless. The result? Burnout and inefficiency. Over time, I learned to shift my focus. Instead of scripting every word and chasing perfection, I now create a rough outline, run thru the material once myself off-camera, and then ad lib most of the content while I'm recording, along with throwing in a few Trek jokes here and there. This approach allows me to produce far more videos without sacrificing quality. In fact, many viewers appreciate the natural, laid-back style, finding it more engaging and relatable than the overly polished versions I initially created.
This principle can be applied universally. Perfectionism often stems from fear of criticism, failure, or not meeting self-imposed standards. However, the pursuit of "good enough" isn't about settling or lowering standards. It's about finding balance, acknowledging diminishing returns, and understanding when additional effort no longer yields proportional benefits. Spending countless hours tweaking minor details on a presentation or report may lead to missed deadlines or opportunities. Waiting for the "perfect time" to start exercising, learning a new skill, or launching a project often results in procrastination. Artists, writers, and creators may shelve projects indefinitely because they don't feel "finished."
In my own journey, embracing "good enough" didn't mean lowering my standards. It meant recognizing the value of progress and understanding what my audience truly valued. Whether it's a functional software program or an engaging video tutorial, the essence of the work often matters more than the polish. By letting go of the need to be perfect, you can achieve more, reduce stress, and often create something that's even better than what you originally envisioned. Remember, "perfect" is subjective, and what you consider imperfect may be exactly what resonates most with others.
Perfection is a worthy goal, but it is often an impossible standard. Progress, not perfection, is what leads to growth and success. Embrace "good enough" and watch how much you can accomplish. Let progress serve the greater purpose and boldly go where you have never gone before.
Well, elsewhere I posted a photo of the one house left standing in a neighborhood after the Pacific Palisades fire.
That guy didn't settle for good enough. The others are out millions.
I can't argue with the logic for videos, they aren't something that people have to use dozens or hundreds of times each day. The occasional error can be handled when a viewer asks for clarification.
The same isn't true of software, at least when it comes to functionality and keeping totals.
I got lots of clients because the company I previously worked at was happy with a good enough total that was plus or minus $20,000 each month.
My first client (for my claim processing business), was very happy to get a new service (based upon software) that balanced to the penny each month.
I had to sweat a lot of details to make that happen. Good enough wouldn't cut it.
I think the distinction that I'm trying to make is that your software can be good enough that it's functional and that it works. It obviously has to work correctly. I'm not talking about leaving bugs in your software and not testing it, but as long as it works and it's functional and it does the job, you don't have to waste tons of time adding all kinds of bells and whistles that most people won't appreciate anyways. That was the point I was trying to get across.
Thomas Gonder
@Reply 14 months ago
@Richard Got it! The part about most people not appreciating it is so true.
I'm working on an address form right now. It turns on and off a lot of bells and whistles based on entry.
Without that though, I fear a lot of users won't understand how to use it properly.
I think testing takes about 85% of my time. It's amazing the questionable things I find after thinking I thought through it all.
Sorry, only students may add comments.
Click here for more
information on how you can set up an account.
If you are a Visitor, go ahead and post your reply as a
new comment, and we'll move it here for you
once it's approved. Be sure to use the same name and email address.
This thread is now CLOSED. If you wish to comment, start a NEW discussion in
Captain's Log.