Computer Learning Zone CLZ Access Excel Word Windows

Remember to look up at the stars and not down at your feet.

-Stephen Hawking
 
Home   Courses   TechHelp   Forums   Help   Contact   Merch   Join   Order   Logon  
 
Back to Captain's Log    Comments List
Upload Images   @Reply   Bookmark    Link   Email   Next Unseen 
I Canna Change the Laws of Physics
Richard Rost 
           
10 months ago
So I'm rewatching some of the old Star Trek: The Original Series episodes, and today's gem was "The Naked Time." You know the one: Sulu goes full Three Musketeers, Spock gets weepy, alt-Kirk gets a little rapey, and the crew basically invents space-bourbon-induced mania without the bourbon.

But here's what really got me: the episode opens with the Enterprise orbiting a collapsing planet. The surface is shrinking, and Spock says something like, "As the planet collapses, the surface is moving away from us. We have to adjust our orbit."

Uhh... no. That's not how gravity works. That's not how any of this works.

It's the same mistake they made again in the 2009 Star Trek reboot, where falling into a black hole is treated like tumbling into a canyon, instead of orbiting it because, you know, physics. If a planet collapses, even all the way down to a singularity, its gravitational pull on you doesn't change unless it gains or loses mass. Orbit is determined by total mass and your distance from it. You could crush the planet down to the size of a ping-pong ball and you'd still be right there in orbit... unless the screenwriters have decided to rewrite Newton's laws.

And look, I get it, Star Trek is science fiction, not a science documentary. I'm totally fine with technobabble like warp drive or transporters as long as you sell it as futuristic tech and build it into the story. I can even accept Red Matter as a magical space MacGuffin (1) if it keeps things moving. But when you start breaking known laws of physics just to keep the plot rolling? Even Scotty would protest. "I canna change the laws of physics, cap'n." (2)

We'll forgive them, of course. Because it's Star Trek. And because sometimes space logic takes a backseat to space drama.

But still. The next time you're writing about a collapsing planet, just remember: gravity doesn't care about your screenplay. Mass is mass.

LLAP
RR

(1) A MacGuffin is a plot device in fiction - usually an object, event, or goal - that drives the story forward but is ultimately unimportant to the actual narrative. Think the briefcase in Pulp Fiction or the Ark of the Covenant in Raiders of the Lost Ark. We don't really care what it is - we just care that everyone else does. It's the thing that gets the plot moving, even if it doesn't matter much by the end.

(2) The line "I canna change the laws of physics, Captain!" is one of the most famous phrases associated with Scotty, but he never actually says it exactly that way in the show. In the episode The Naked Time, he says, "I can't change the laws of physics. I've got to have thirty minutes!" - no "canna." The Scottish-flavored version became popular through years of impressions, parodies, and pop culture shorthand, but it's technically a misquote. Scotty does say "canna" in other lines (like "Ye canna mix matter and antimatter cold!"), which likely helped cement the myth. It's sort of like "Beam me up, Scotty" - another line nobody ever actually says that way.
Richard Rost OP  @Reply  
           
10 months ago

Richard Rost OP  @Reply  
           
10 months ago
I asked ChatGPT to make me this image of Scotty saying he can't change the laws of physics - and I've got to hand it to the AI (pun intended), it gave me the right number of fingers... which is actually wrong. In real life, James Doohan (the actor who played Scotty) lost a finger during WWII, and they famously worked around it on screen for years. So the image here shows a full set of digits, which Scotty himself didn't have. The funny part? ChatGPT has historically been bad at putting the correct number of fingers on people - and now that it's finally fixed that issue, it turns out that accuracy is inaccurate. LOL. Still, respect to Doohan for being a real-life hero and chief engineer of the Enterprise.
Matt Hall  @Reply  
          
10 months ago
As an electrician, I am used to the mistakes writers make surrounding technical topics.   I also like the infinite zoom capabilities of security cameras in police shows.
Richard Rost OP  @Reply  
           
10 months ago
Yeah, they always remind me of that scene in Blade Runner when Deckard is zooming in and moving around in a picture and gets some incredibly crazy details. Now granted that's in the future. But still. It's insane what they're able to do.

I saw another meme where it was like a rover on Mars millions of miles away and we get incredibly detailed pictures, but you know, bank robbers at a 7-Eleven - it's the grainiest picture you've ever seen in your life.
Matt Hall  @Reply  
          
10 months ago
Well, I am guessing that the folks building the rover were trying to get the best camera while the 7-Eleven security contractor was trying to get the cheapest camera they could, years ago, when they installed it.  Maybe they should "enhance" the 7-Eleven picture...like on TV. :)
Thomas Gonder  @Reply  
      
10 months ago
Richard Maybe Spock wanted to maintain a set distance from the surface? I didn't watch the show (or remember it), so I'm not sure what the objective was.
Stanley Mc Keown  @Reply  
     
10 months ago
My background is in electronics so I couldn't help noticing some common components every time Scotty or Spock was poking around in below lieutenant Uhuras buttons. BU208 transistors were in nearly every shot.
Stanley Mc Keown  @Reply  
     
10 months ago

Stanley Mc Keown  @Reply  
     
10 months ago
Lucky old Spock -- though I believe JK was even luckier
Michael Olgren  @Reply  
      
10 months ago
Richard Just to flesh on Doohan’s story- he lost that finger landing with the Canadian forces on D-Day. I read his autobiography a few years back. Doohan was Canadian but great with voice acting. He does a number of the voices on the animated series. Softball trivia question- who does the voice of the Enterprise computer (on TOS)?

If you want to read a book with accurate science, I highly recommend Andy Weir’s Project Hail Mary. Science everywhere and well told. I’m only 118 pages in, but really enjoying it. There’ll be a movie with Ryan Gosling coming out in the fall I think.
Richard Rost OP  @Reply  
           
10 months ago
Lwaxana, of course. She's been the voice of the Enterprise forever. I'm really surprised they didn't sample her voice or recreate it with AI for Strange New Worlds, but I guess they decided not to.
Michael Olgren  @Reply  
      
10 months ago
??? It was Majel Barrett. She did the computer voice, I think as long as she was alive. Gene R's wife.
Richard Rost OP  @Reply  
           
10 months ago
Yah... That's what I said.

This thread is now CLOSED. If you wish to comment, start a NEW discussion in Captain's Log.
 

Next Unseen

 
New Feature: Comment Live View
 
 

The following is a paid advertisement
Computer Learning Zone is not responsible for any content shown or offers made by these ads.
 

Learn
 
Access - index
Excel - index
Word - index
Windows - index
PowerPoint - index
Photoshop - index
Visual Basic - index
ASP - index
Seminars
More...
Customers
 
Login
My Account
My Courses
Lost Password
Memberships
Student Databases
Change Email
Info
 
Latest News
New Releases
User Forums
Topic Glossary
Tips & Tricks
Search The Site
Code Vault
Collapse Menus
Help
 
Customer Support
Web Site Tour
FAQs
TechHelp
Consulting Services
About
 
Background
Testimonials
Jobs
Affiliate Program
Richard Rost
Free Lessons
Mailing List
PCResale.NET
Order
 
Video Tutorials
Handbooks
Memberships
Learning Connection
Idiot's Guide to Excel
Volume Discounts
Payment Info
Shipping
Terms of Sale
Contact
 
Contact Info
Support Policy
Mailing Address
Phone Number
Fax Number
Course Survey
Email Richard
[email protected]
Blog RSS Feed    YouTube Channel

LinkedIn
Copyright 2026 by Computer Learning Zone, Amicron, and Richard Rost. All Rights Reserved. Current Time: 5/6/2026 10:22:45 PM. PLT: 1s