If I had a penny for every tech tip, home remedy, or shocking fact I've heard over the years, I'd finally be able to retire and open that all-you-can-eat gagh buffet. It turns out that in this glorious information age, the real endangered species is actual, verifiable truth. That's why the late, great Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit is more vital than ever. His first principle? Don't just take anyone's word for it - always seek independent confirmation before believing a claim.

Back when I started teaching Microsoft Access, I used to get regular emails from students who'd read some online expert claiming Access couldn't do this or shouldn't do that. Access can't connect to SQL Server. Isn't Access too risky for business data? Half the time, people were parroting urban legends or vendor marketing copy. So, instead of shrugging, I learned to dig a little deeper. Nothing stops misinformation faster than rolling up your sleeves and testing things for yourself. One favorite moment was discovering Access could easily handle way more simultaneous users than someone insisted - provided you split your database and didn't store 2GB of embedded cat videos. Trust, but verify.

This habit of demanding evidence crosses every domain. I'm amazed at how often even experienced programmers treat Stack Overflow answers, TikTok tips, or blog rants as gospel - then get tripped up by omitted details or assumptions. In business, a single unchecked claim can set off months of wasted work and reverse progress. Once, a client swore their supply database just worked. Until we checked their backups - turns out the last good copy was from the Obama administration. Just because a system seems fine doesn't mean it really is. Measure twice, deploy once.

And it's not just tech. Confirmation bias oozes into relationships, health, and don't get me started on modern politics. Google said it, so it's true. Don't trust the slogan, the influencer, or even your favorite YouTube Access instructor (yes, myself included!). Test it yourself, or at a minimum, see who else comes up with the same result. Even Spock wouldn't accept a diagnosis based on a single tricorder reading. Well, maybe if it was his tricorder and he was doing the reading. :)

Star Trek's Court Martial comes to mind. Kirk's entire career nearly derailed when computer evidence is manipulated. It was only through independent witness testimony and tireless cross-checking that the truth emerged. If Starfleet can't run on blind trust, neither should we.

So, whether building a database, picking the healthiest snack, or debating intergalactic law, look for independent evidence before signing off on any claim - especially the ones that flatter your existing beliefs. Confidence is great, but confirmation is better. How often do you demand outside evidence before accepting something as true, and is there an area where you need to raise your baloney detection shields?

LLAP
RR