It was a pleasure to hear your tribute to Sir Patrick Stewart, and I was especially gratified that you recognized an important distinction: however talented Stewart may have been as an actor, the great Jean-Luc Picard is a fictional character commanding a fictional starship in a fictional universe. Behind his wisdom, judgment, and memorable words were real writers, and I believe they deserve much of the credit for creating the character we admire.
As you mentioned, the original *Star Trek* was somewhat cartoonish, although it certainly didn't seem that way to me back in 1966. Watching the reruns decades later, I've come to recognize that Captain Kirk had plenty of flaws, as did the writers who created his adventures.
My own father was very much present in my life, and he was a pretty good father, especially considering that he had grown up without one himself. He could be gruff and overly critical - sometimes considerably more than a little - but on balance, his influence on me was positive. His morals weren't perfect, but growing up in the 1960s, I can't think of anyone else, even a fictional one, I would have wanted as a surrogate role model.
I grew up in troubled times without cute fantasies to gloss it over. My own serious test of character came during the Vietnam War. At the time, the killing of innocent civilians by American military forces, whether through aerial machine-gun fire or bombardment, was a disturbing reality of the war. I still don't know quite what my father was thinking when he encouraged me to attend the Air Force Academy (other than avoiding an expensive college education--because he was always one to stand up for the little guy). But after seeing training films documenting such slaughters, I knew that the Air Force, and the general lack of concern over war crimes, was not the place for me. The real-world "generals" of the past sixty years, that sit in comfy chairs, in fancy hotels eating gourmet meals, far behind the front lines don't earn my respect by simply saying, "Make it so!"
So, I tip my hat to the writers of *Star Trek: The Next Generation*. I only discovered the series in recent years. When it originally aired, I was far too busy being a father, running a business, and keeping clients happy to spend much time watching television.
What I now appreciate most about the series is the depth of thought behind its stories and the genuine willingness of its writers to confront difficult moral questions - questions that often have no simple or comfortable answers. Answers that frequently defy the "Prime Directive". Patrick Stewart brought extraordinary talent to those stories. However for me, it is the writers who gave Captain Picard the principles, dilemmas, and words that made him such a compelling, and sadly, fictional character.
It's funny you mentioned the Air Force because when I was in high school, I actually considered going into the Air Force myself. Then I realized something about myself: I'm absolutely terrible at taking orders. LOL.
I've never been particularly good at having someone else tell me what to do, whether it was teachers in school, bosses at work, or even working on teams. Especially when the person giving the orders knew less about the subject than I did. That's a big part of why I dropped out of college and started my own business at such a young age. I figured out pretty quickly that I was much happier being my own boss.
I even lost a few consulting clients over the years because I wasn't afraid to tell them when they were wrong. People love to say "the customer is always right," but there's another version of that saying that I much prefer: "In matters of style, the customer is always right." And that's absolutely true. You want your database to have a purple background with pink buttons? Knock yourself out. But when it comes to how the software actually works, that's where my expertise comes in. You're paying me to build something that works properly, not just to agree with everything you say. Some clients didn't appreciate that. So yeah, I don't think the Air Force would have been a particularly good fit for me either.
And you're absolutely right about the writers. They deserve tremendous credit for creating the characters, stories, and moral dilemmas that made TNG so special. Patrick Stewart brought Picard to life, but the writers gave him something worth saying. That's also why I wanted to make the distinction between Picard and Stewart in my tribute. Picard was the character I grew up watching and admiring, but as I got older, I came to admire Patrick Stewart himself, especially for his charity work, his advocacy, and the kind of person he showed himself to be offscreen. We lost a fantastic actor, but more importantly, I think we lost a genuinely good human being. And that's what made his passing so difficult for me.
Thanks for sharing your story. I'm glad you enjoyed the tribute, and I appreciate your perspective.
Thomas GonderOP
@Reply 7 days ago
Richard If you are about thinking and questioning how things are, then yes, the Air Force wasn't for you. Of his many professions, my dad was also a middle school teacher that thought the most important thing he could impart to young minds was the ability to think.
Also being a journalist, he thought much of writers like his friend Tom Clancey. He had breakfast with a troop of actors and writers most mornings near Santa Barbara. He once said, "Good actors are exceptional liars that can make us believe they are something they aren't."
I did pick up on your subtle change of direction in the original tribute, and homage to the writers. Years ago, I made the acquaintance of a psychiatrist who worked on shows like Cheers, Friends and Sex in the City. He told me that behind the scenes, there's some psychological games that they play, with the writers, to make the characters more appealing to the broadest of audiences.
That's a great lesson for a teacher to pass along. The ability to think critically, ask questions, and not just accept the first answer handed to you is enormously important.
And your dad's quote about actors is spot on. The very best ones make you forget you're watching someone perform. The writers and the actors are really doing different parts of the same magic - one creates the person on the page, and the other convinces us that person is real.
That's fascinating about the psychiatrist working with the writers, too. It makes perfect sense that successful shows would have people thinking carefully about why audiences connect with certain characters.
Sorry, only students may add comments.
Click here for more
information on how you can set up an account.
If you are a Visitor, go ahead and post your reply as a
new comment, and we'll move it here for you
once it's approved. Be sure to use the same name and email address.