At about 00:45 You say, "Well then we get into my discussion that bad data is better than no data."  I think you meant just the opposite.  (You do clarify later on what you are trying to say.)

---

Reply from Richard Rost:

I did... you're right. Oops. Slip of the tongue! NO DATA is better than BAD DATA! That's the second little goof like that to have been discovered this week. I must be slipping in my old age.